does anybody knows card international uk ltd?
i just want to if this agency still operates? this agency hires nurses and health carers in united kingdom,
Careers & Employment - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Do you mean Care International a global humanitarian organisation working with over 45 million people in 70 of the world's poorest countries. Link to their site below
Read more discussion :
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Who is NURSES 2 CANADA. IS IT A Real one or not i got a job offer
Who is NURSES 2 CANADA. IS IT A Real one or not i got a job offer ?
I got an offer from NURSES 2 CANADA and wanted to know if they are genuine. Their address in Canada is 20465 Douglas Cresent, Langley, British Columbia, V3A 4B6 and in United Kingdom is SHIV SANS LIMITED, Suite: 8 - 10, Gough House, 57 Eden Street, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey - KT1 1DA, United Kingdom. Their website address is www.nurses2canada.net
Health Care - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I don't know if that one website is true, but Canada is really hard up for nurses right now. So if you are an RPN or RN and wanting to move to Canada, chances are pretty likely that you could find a job. I don't know how work visas, education equivalencies and all that fun stuff work, but again, there are TONS of nursing positions here.
2 :
There is no company in the UK called SHIV SANS LIMITED. Like the other jobs offers you have received, this looks like a scam.
Read more discussion :
I got an offer from NURSES 2 CANADA and wanted to know if they are genuine. Their address in Canada is 20465 Douglas Cresent, Langley, British Columbia, V3A 4B6 and in United Kingdom is SHIV SANS LIMITED, Suite: 8 - 10, Gough House, 57 Eden Street, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey - KT1 1DA, United Kingdom. Their website address is www.nurses2canada.net
Health Care - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I don't know if that one website is true, but Canada is really hard up for nurses right now. So if you are an RPN or RN and wanting to move to Canada, chances are pretty likely that you could find a job. I don't know how work visas, education equivalencies and all that fun stuff work, but again, there are TONS of nursing positions here.
2 :
There is no company in the UK called SHIV SANS LIMITED. Like the other jobs offers you have received, this looks like a scam.
Read more discussion :
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
if an ordinary meaning approach to the words of the statutes had been adopted by a majority of the judges.
if an ordinary meaning approach to the words of the statutes had been adopted by a majority of the judges.?
speeches of members of the House of Lords in the case of Royal college of nursing of the united kingdom v DHSS
Law & Ethics - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
What's the question.... ? Law has always had to balance against using the meanings of ancient terms found in the profession, and the definitions handed down by court precedent, or changing all the definitions to match what lay-people think the word should mean. Sometimes, words are badly defined and we're stuck with them. Sometimes, words are well defined, but the common person doesn't understand the actual meaning, or the media gets it wrong and people think the term means something else. It's always a juggling act.
2 :
The case holds that the courts have to consider parliamentary intent if the language is ambiguous or new facts arise that were unanticipated by Parliament at the time the law was enacted. It is that latter portion that some in the House of Lords found troublesome. A quote from the case is below: "In interpreting an Act of Parliament it is proper, and indeed necessary, to have regard to the state of affairs existing, and known by Parliament to be existing, at the time. It is a fair presumption that Parliament's policy or intention is directed to that state of affairs. Leaving aside cases of omission by inadvertence, this being not such a case, when a new state of affairs, or a fresh set of facts bearing on policy, comes into existence, the courts have to consider whether they fall within the Parliamentary intention. They may be held to do so, if they fall within the same genus of facts as those to which the expressed policy has been formulated. They may also be held to do so if there can be detected a clear purpose in the legislation which can only be fulfilled if the extension is made. How liberally these principles may be applied must depend upon the nature of the enactment, and the strictness or otherwise of the words in which it has been expressed."
Read more discussion :
speeches of members of the House of Lords in the case of Royal college of nursing of the united kingdom v DHSS
Law & Ethics - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
What's the question.... ? Law has always had to balance against using the meanings of ancient terms found in the profession, and the definitions handed down by court precedent, or changing all the definitions to match what lay-people think the word should mean. Sometimes, words are badly defined and we're stuck with them. Sometimes, words are well defined, but the common person doesn't understand the actual meaning, or the media gets it wrong and people think the term means something else. It's always a juggling act.
2 :
The case holds that the courts have to consider parliamentary intent if the language is ambiguous or new facts arise that were unanticipated by Parliament at the time the law was enacted. It is that latter portion that some in the House of Lords found troublesome. A quote from the case is below: "In interpreting an Act of Parliament it is proper, and indeed necessary, to have regard to the state of affairs existing, and known by Parliament to be existing, at the time. It is a fair presumption that Parliament's policy or intention is directed to that state of affairs. Leaving aside cases of omission by inadvertence, this being not such a case, when a new state of affairs, or a fresh set of facts bearing on policy, comes into existence, the courts have to consider whether they fall within the Parliamentary intention. They may be held to do so, if they fall within the same genus of facts as those to which the expressed policy has been formulated. They may also be held to do so if there can be detected a clear purpose in the legislation which can only be fulfilled if the extension is made. How liberally these principles may be applied must depend upon the nature of the enactment, and the strictness or otherwise of the words in which it has been expressed."
Read more discussion :
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Should we follow the British and change our immigration system
Should we follow the British and change our immigration system?
It seems to me this is EXACTLY what we need. It's what we had before Kennedy's disasterous 1965 immigration "reform." http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/4/19/143015.shtml?s=ic Britain Adopting 'Points' Immigration Britain will adopt a points-based system restricting immigration to those with skills in need and rejecting those who would compete with local workers for unskilled jobs. The system, which follows an Australian model, would assign points to immigration applicants according to their skills and job prospects in the United Kingdom, and place applicants in one of five tiers. The first tier, for highly skilled applicants such as scientists and entrepreneurs, will be launched at the beginning of next year, according to the Sydney Morning Herald in Australia. It will be followed later in the year by tiers for skilled workers, such as nurses and teachers with job offers.
Immigration - 15 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
i say we build a giant wall and keep all the illegals out!
2 :
That and a heavily armed border!
3 :
We have had immigration quotas since the early 1900s. The problem with illegal immigration to get around those quotas is actually that old. The Mexicans are just the latest flavor. Originally, the quotas were set in stone per the 1890 census. Whatever ethnic mix existed in 1890 was maintained. For example, if America were 2% Japanese, only 2% of immigrants could be Japanese. (I don't know if it's related or not, but the 1890 census is the only one ever destroyed by fire. All other census records are still intact as far back as 1790.)
4 :
I think that would be an excellent reform, although we must first stop the waves of illegal immigration from our borders.
5 :
Great idea...BUT!... Keep in mind that nations like Brittan and Japan are island nations. The U.S. is not. If we were an O'Neil Cylinder at point L-5, it might be difficult for "undocumenteds" to cross the expanse of space and enter. We are not. We need a wall first. And a proper guard, befitting a nation of our stature. Then, we can deal with legislation issues. Otherwise, those who violate our laws and are sent back, will just return. who needs that?
6 :
Yes... maybe then we will have more jobs !!! Now they are hitting our highways in semi-trucks not caring CDLS and our D.O.T standards on trucks. More U.S. jobs taken , better yet more snuck across our border. When does it start April 23rd, if you truck join thee slow roll April 23,24,and 25th. Run 2X2 down the interstate...do your job....at legal minium speed.Circle of Wagons ....bumper to bumper all three days at the national capitol and all 48 state capitols...JOIN THE AMERICAN TRUCKER TRUCK OUT RALLY.
7 :
This system would cater to white collar people while leaving blue collar people (migrant workers, etc.) in the dust. I guess that it would fit perfectly here as that seems to be the American way these days...
8 :
WOW. I am a US citizen and would never make it point wise.
9 :
Yes, but laws won't do any good if they aren't enforced.
10 :
But we need first to finish the wall along the border, hiring of course, illegal workers to make it cheaper, hoping not to be fined. lol ( it really happened to a construction company, which was fined for hiring illegals on this task ). Seriously. I thing that the British system would work, Let's think smart and do the right things to fit the USA necessities without prejudice.
11 :
we need to adopt this plane into our system. good for the British.
12 :
Sounds good - but unless there is enforcement of the laws - and that means no longer will there be any amnesty given - I don't see just making the changes are going to do any good. Without a positive enforcement - it leaves us in the same mess that we are in already. First we have to get rid of the illegals. Fine those that are giving them jobs and incentive for coming here. Enforce the laws already on the books - THEN maybe start thinking of possible changes to keep this mess from happening again. Cause such does need to be addressed. We have programs that are so over burdened that they are at a breaking point - as well as the taxpayers just can't pick up any more of the tab.
13 :
I'm not aware that the UK has any immigration system in place other than 'If your a dreg from a third world country,come on in'. You should visit the UK sometime. No problem finding an Indian restaurant. Blaaa!
Read more discussion :
It seems to me this is EXACTLY what we need. It's what we had before Kennedy's disasterous 1965 immigration "reform." http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/4/19/143015.shtml?s=ic Britain Adopting 'Points' Immigration Britain will adopt a points-based system restricting immigration to those with skills in need and rejecting those who would compete with local workers for unskilled jobs. The system, which follows an Australian model, would assign points to immigration applicants according to their skills and job prospects in the United Kingdom, and place applicants in one of five tiers. The first tier, for highly skilled applicants such as scientists and entrepreneurs, will be launched at the beginning of next year, according to the Sydney Morning Herald in Australia. It will be followed later in the year by tiers for skilled workers, such as nurses and teachers with job offers.
Immigration - 15 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
i say we build a giant wall and keep all the illegals out!
2 :
That and a heavily armed border!
3 :
We have had immigration quotas since the early 1900s. The problem with illegal immigration to get around those quotas is actually that old. The Mexicans are just the latest flavor. Originally, the quotas were set in stone per the 1890 census. Whatever ethnic mix existed in 1890 was maintained. For example, if America were 2% Japanese, only 2% of immigrants could be Japanese. (I don't know if it's related or not, but the 1890 census is the only one ever destroyed by fire. All other census records are still intact as far back as 1790.)
4 :
I think that would be an excellent reform, although we must first stop the waves of illegal immigration from our borders.
5 :
Great idea...BUT!... Keep in mind that nations like Brittan and Japan are island nations. The U.S. is not. If we were an O'Neil Cylinder at point L-5, it might be difficult for "undocumenteds" to cross the expanse of space and enter. We are not. We need a wall first. And a proper guard, befitting a nation of our stature. Then, we can deal with legislation issues. Otherwise, those who violate our laws and are sent back, will just return. who needs that?
6 :
Yes... maybe then we will have more jobs !!! Now they are hitting our highways in semi-trucks not caring CDLS and our D.O.T standards on trucks. More U.S. jobs taken , better yet more snuck across our border. When does it start April 23rd, if you truck join thee slow roll April 23,24,and 25th. Run 2X2 down the interstate...do your job....at legal minium speed.Circle of Wagons ....bumper to bumper all three days at the national capitol and all 48 state capitols...JOIN THE AMERICAN TRUCKER TRUCK OUT RALLY.
7 :
This system would cater to white collar people while leaving blue collar people (migrant workers, etc.) in the dust. I guess that it would fit perfectly here as that seems to be the American way these days...
8 :
WOW. I am a US citizen and would never make it point wise.
9 :
Yes, but laws won't do any good if they aren't enforced.
10 :
But we need first to finish the wall along the border, hiring of course, illegal workers to make it cheaper, hoping not to be fined. lol ( it really happened to a construction company, which was fined for hiring illegals on this task ). Seriously. I thing that the British system would work, Let's think smart and do the right things to fit the USA necessities without prejudice.
11 :
we need to adopt this plane into our system. good for the British.
12 :
Sounds good - but unless there is enforcement of the laws - and that means no longer will there be any amnesty given - I don't see just making the changes are going to do any good. Without a positive enforcement - it leaves us in the same mess that we are in already. First we have to get rid of the illegals. Fine those that are giving them jobs and incentive for coming here. Enforce the laws already on the books - THEN maybe start thinking of possible changes to keep this mess from happening again. Cause such does need to be addressed. We have programs that are so over burdened that they are at a breaking point - as well as the taxpayers just can't pick up any more of the tab.
13 :
I'm not aware that the UK has any immigration system in place other than 'If your a dreg from a third world country,come on in'. You should visit the UK sometime. No problem finding an Indian restaurant. Blaaa!
Read more discussion :
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)